Secure Code Review

ThunderShield's secure code review audits source code for injection flaws, broken access control, insecure deserialization, and hardcoded secrets. We combine static analysis with expert manual inspection — covering OWASP Top 10 and SANS CWE Top 25 — and map every finding to a specific code location with a practical fix.

Secure Code Review Process

SAST combining automated static analysis with expert manual review

  1. Code Preparation：Collect source code and understand your application architecture and technology stack.
  2. Static Analysis：Use automated static analysis tools to detect potential security issues.
  3. Manual Review：Perform detailed code review by experienced security specialists.
  4. Validation：Validate findings and assess severity and exploitability.
  5. Report and Recommendations：Deliver a detailed report with findings, fixes, and best practices.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is secure code review fully automated?

No. We combine SAST tooling with manual expert review to reduce blind spots and false positives from automation-only workflows.

Which tech stacks and frameworks are supported?

Most common web and backend stacks can be assessed. We align review strategy to your language, framework, and dependency profile before starting.

Will findings include remediation priority?

Yes. Each finding includes severity, impact context, remediation guidance, and a prioritized fixing order.

Contact ThunderShield for a consultation · View pricing plans